Only one side has been continuously attacking the other side.
Really? You honestly believe that? This is an example of the blinders of a bias. I see both sides attack each other all the time.
I am not going to go back and take score, but I do not recall you as being for any republican president.
I liked Romney, I have not been a fanboy of anyone else really (cue Pete's decade long diatribe about Romney). I have never been a fanboy of a democrat, but this time, ANY candidate looks good compared to Trump. Also, I have never despised a presidential candidate on either side as much as I despise Trump (Hillary was close). I usually liked the republican candidate just a bit more than their opponent.
Have you researched, and listened to all of what trump said last week?
Every thing that helped me draw my conclusions about Trump came directly from something he said or did.
Have you looked into why the capital police were not prepared?
I have not, how could I? I'm not sure what you think I do for a living but I am not in a position to investigate the Capitol Police. That said, I WILL NOT default to a conspiracy theory. That is just asinine.
You claim to be non biased, but you are worse then anybody here.
LOL, that's funny, especially when there is plenty of evidence that I will bash and praise either side as needed, something you guys will never do. Seriously, think about what you are saying....you guys are rationalizing what happened at the Capitol!...even some staunch republicans are condemning it and what led up to it. If it was democrats doing that, or my other example of a democrat doing the shit that Trump has been doing to try and bypass the election, you guys would lose your shit. But it's Trump, it's ok.
Hard to do when the evidence is impossible to get to. They have plenty of affidavits, videos, and other evidence.
Uhm, no. If the evidence is hard to get to, how do they know it happened? Think about it. Trump said it himself as he was setting you guys up for the last six months to accept a fraudulent election...."the only way I could lose is if they cheat". Is that rational? No, it is not.
How many cases were turned down for lack of standing? oh yes, all of them.
Nope, not even close. Where do you guys get this shit? They were "heard" in 50+ courts.....they just couldn't produce this mythical evidence.